HR Compliance Information Specialists - LegalWorkplace.com
Sign In | Register | View Cart
 

Brought to you by the Alexander Hamilton InstituteBrought to you by the Alexander Hamilton Institute

 
  Speak with a customer care representative
by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Speak with a customer care representative by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
FREE E-NEWSLETTERS
Bonus: Sign up today and get a free report, How To Conduct HR Audits.

Employment Law Today
Benefits Alert
HR Soapbox Blog
E-Mail:  Go

We value your privacy.
Research Topics
Benefits
Discipline/Performance Issues
Discrimination
Hiring
Leave
Payroll Management
Privacy Policy Guidelines
Record-Keeping Documents
Safety & Health
Termination
Training
Free Reports
Free HR Forms
Free Job Descriptions & Interview Questions
State DOL & Other HR Websites
Message Board
AHI Store
Products by Topic
Products A to Z
Web Conferences
Labor Law Posters

 

Subscribe: RDF Feed


Recent Posts:

 


Categories:



Forward blog to a friend.

Cathie's Corner Blog

The Laws, They Are A-Changing

(Discrimination and Harassment, Leave and Attendance, Pay) Permanent link

(Published October 12, 2009)

One of the things I find myself repeating endlessly is, "Check your state laws." We all know that state law can vary from federal law, but every once in a while I run into a state law that is somewhat unique even from other states. It was suggested to me recently that I make a list of a few of these laws. Hopefully if you are in the state in question, I'm not telling you anything you don't already know, but who knows? It might be useful if you open up a branch, or hire a salesperson, or have a new client who needs on-site work, in a state other than your own.

I came across this one only recently. We all know, or should know, that federal law gives employers the right to dock exempt employees' salaries only in very limited circumstances. One of those circumstances is when they have used all their available sick time (yes, I'm simplifying). But in New Hampshire, an employer cannot dock an exempt employee for illness at all, unless the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) applies. The state law covers most of the other situations that federal law covers, except for illness. (NH 275:43-b)

One of the most unusual laws I've ever run across is a law in South Dakota that allows employers to hold an employee's final paycheck until the employee has returned all of the employer's property. This is not to say that the employer can take their time about it; if the property is not returned until after the pay would normally be due, it must be paid as quickly as possible after the property comes in. But for the state to give an employer permission to hold the check? That's rare. (SD 60-11-10)

There are quite a few states that require an employer to allow their employees time off to vote. In most of those states, it's a standard block of time for all employees; between two and three hours in most cases. However, in Nevada, the amount of time the employee is allowed to take depends on how far they live from the polling place. I don't know how many employers will actually want to take the time to double check the distance between each employee's home and the location of the nearest polling place, but they might want to at least keep an eye on how much time people are taking! (NV Rev. Stat. Ann. 293.463)

States also vary in terms of categories protected under their anti-discrimination laws. The following is only a sampling; do not take this list as complete:

Political affiliation — CA, DC, NY

Personal appearance — DC

Height and weight — MI

Use of a service animal — NV, NJ, NY, PA, VA, WA

Observance of Sabbath — NY

Familial status — PA

There are others, and other states, but these were the ones that stood out for me.

State laws are changing rapidly, and it's our responsibility to know what they are!

Catherine Bannon is an HR consultant in Marshfield, MA (catherine.bannon@gmail.com). Bannon worked for 10 years in HR management before starting her consulting practice.


West Virginia: §21-3-19. Discrimination for use of tobacco products prohibited.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any employer, whether public or private, or the agent of such employer to refuse to hire any individual or to discharge any employee or otherwise to disadvantage or penalize any employee with respect to compensation, terms, conditions or privileges of employment solely because such individual uses tobacco products off the premises of the employer during nonworking hours.

(b) This section shall not apply with respect to an employer which is a nonprofit organization which, as one of its primary purposes or objectives, discourages the use of one or more tobacco products by the general public.

(c) This section shall not prohibit an employer from offering, imposing or having in effect a health, disability or life insurance policy which makes distinctions between employees for type of coverage or price of coverage based upon the employee's use of tobacco products: Provided, That any differential premium rates charged to employees must reflect differential costs to the employer: Provided, however, That the employer must provide employees with a statement delineating the differential rates used by its insurance carriers.

(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an employer from making available to smokers and other users of tobacco products, programs, free of charge or at reduced rates, which encourage the reduction or cessation of smoking or tobacco use.
Posted by: Linda McDonald at 10/14/2009 9:41 AM


I cover an area that includes 13 states and it is a huge challenge to keep up with the state specific changes. It is time consuming and so easy to miss some. I usually get updates from various sources. Where do you get your updates on these changes?
Posted by: HR - RM at 10/16/2009 9:49 PM


You can get updates from some of the materials right here on this site. I also use some from Nolo and the BLR
Posted by: Cathie at 10/18/2009 7:42 PM


I am an H.R person- I am not a lawyer. I do not offer legal advice. I do not pretend to offer legal advice. I don't even watch Law and Order any more, so I'm not even up on the nuances of NY criminal law.

Yes sure, you must know the law to be a good HR person. However, the law you must know is limited and we have lawyers who we rely on if things get complicated. But, HR isn't so much of a "negotiating" with employees kind of a role as it is a "coaching" role. The people who negotiate with the labor unions tend to be lawyers. The people who deal with the day to day grievances and provide general HR services to union members tend not to be.

In house counsel is the lawyers-not H.R. We love them. They keep us from making stupid and illegal mistakes. Or at least they advise us that we are making stupid mistakes and then we do it anyway. But the quickest way to end up in hot water as an H.R person is to dictate to in house counsel employment law from information gathered on the internet, that sort of thing just does not fly. The companies position on state law issues are handed down from in house counsel to H.R not from H.R to counsel. A well run H.R department works in harmony with the legal dept, no need to do the lawyers job on the internet.
Posted by: Eileen at 11/2/2009 10:11 AM


Leave a comment
Name *
Email: *
Homepage
Comment


Sign Up To Receive Cathie's Corner Blog

Copyright © 2010 Alexander Hamilton Institute | Home | Privacy Policy | About AHI | Contact Us | Site Map