HR Compliance Information Specialists - LegalWorkplace.com
Sign In | Register | View Cart
 

Brought to you by the Alexander Hamilton InstituteBrought to you by the Alexander Hamilton Institute

 
  Speak with a customer care representative
by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Speak with a customer care representative by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
FREE E-NEWSLETTERS
Bonus: Sign up today and get a free report, How To Conduct HR Audits.

Employment Law Today
Benefits Alert
HR Soapbox Blog
E-Mail:  Go

We value your privacy.
Research Topics
Benefits
Discipline/Performance Issues
Discrimination
Hiring
Leave
Payroll Management
Privacy Policy Guidelines
Record-Keeping Documents
Safety & Health
Termination
Training
Free Reports
Free HR Forms
Free Job Descriptions & Interview Questions
State DOL & Other HR Websites
Message Board
AHI Store
Products by Topic
Products A to Z
Web Conferences
Labor Law Posters

 

Subscribe: RDF Feed


Recent Posts:

 



Forward blog to a friend.

HR Soapbox Blog

Senator Obama, You're Hired!

 Permanent link

(Published November 10, 2008) 

A Presidential election is essentially a nation-wide hiring decision. We narrow the pack of job candidates through the primary process; study their résumés with care; interview them (by proxy) via the media and the debates; and observe how they handle real-time crises and how they manage their multi-million-dollar campaigns as a test for "the real thing."

Well, after the longest hiring process in history, we've hired ourselves a new Chief Executive. My confession: Despite my sometimes over-the-top enthusiasm over this election, I was never overly worried about the eventual outcome, because I believed that both candidates actually had "the right stuff" to be our national CEO.

And what constitutes "the right stuff"? Personnel Decisions International, a global leadership consulting firm, came up with a list of leadership qualities that it felt successful business CEO candidates must possess. It invited Web users to weigh in on which of these characteristics were most important for "our Next National CEO" to possess. Here are the results, ranked from most to least important in the minds of the survey participants:

  1. Insightful judgment
  2. Visionary
  3. Trustworthy
  4. Gets things done
  5. Inspires others
  6. Good judge of people
  7. Influences others
  8. Courageous
  9. Confident
  10. Energetic

I believe both candidates possessed all of these qualities (albeit to varying degrees).

Other important qualities I believe should be considered when hiring a leader, whether of a nation or a company:

  • the ability to learn on the job (and we're talking about a huge learning curve here!);
  • the ability to multi-task (like, say, how one can successfully campaign and debate and work on passing a $700 billion bailout bill all at the same time);
  • both the willingness and the capacity to listen to different points of view (both qualities that, I'm sorry, but I believe our last Chief Executive may have lacked); and
  • the ability to communicate effectively with the public, with underlings, and with other leaders. ( Of note: Both President-elect Obama and Vice President-elect Biden are former law professors, which, hopefully, means that they have the ability not only to understand complex ideas, but also have honed their ability to reformulate those ideas and communicate them in a way less knowledgeable people can understand.)

Of course, no leader is a miracle worker. In fact, Obama aides are currently going around trying to lower what they fear are unrealistically high expectations of what the President-elect will be able to accomplish in his first year or so in office.

But again, I'm not worried. My view: In 2000 and 2004, we hired a leader who offered us a sense of security. Now, we've hired a leader who offers us a sense of hope. Hope that the economy can and will turn around. Hope that we can bring our troops home sooner rather than later. And hope that the American dream is not dead and buried, after all.

 

Eileen Mager
Writer


"And hope that the American dream is not dead and buried, after all."
Do you remember that you are talking about Obama? Get real!
Posted by: Susan at 11/11/2008 3:21 PM


When hiring a candidate for an important or high profile job, it is critical that the hiring managers assemble and analyze as much information about the candidate as possible. That did NOT occur in this particular hiring process. If the American Public had been informed of Obama's background and experience, it's doubtful he would have been elected.
Posted by: pn at 11/11/2008 3:53 PM


I'm astonished this article would appear in an HR News Letter. You "believe both candidates possessed all of these qualities (albeit to varying degrees". Behavioral based interviewing would tell any HR professional that we make hiring decisions on past actions that support the requirements we're looking for. A resume doesn't tell us how the candidate will perform. Past actions are the best indicator of future performance. Can you provide past actions that support your claim that both candidates possess the 10 qualities. If you could, you might have an article that was appropriate for an HR publication.
Posted by: Jeff Jump at 11/12/2008 8:11 AM


Ouch, we all have a right to our opinion. Chill out.
Posted by: Lew at 11/12/2008 8:20 AM


Using your list, I question your insight. When a biased media can sway the public from some very important information to direct the election, I question the quality of anyone elected. What we learned from this election is that you cannot question, it's harmful to your wellbeing. But then, Hitler established a civilian service to do just what our American media has done already. I consider that a warning and insight for what is to come.

As an HR professional, I am ashamed for you and your article.

Insightful judgment - where, when
Visionary - only if you are poor and cannot see yourself ever earning enough to get pegged for that increase we are still wondering about.
Trustworthy - Obama is one of the most untrustworthy candidates I've seen in 40 years!
Gets things done - The previous statement is supported because he has gotten nothing done to date except to run for office!
Inspires others - I am definately not inspired.
Good judge of people - because his judgement is way off and it scares me that you are not concerned about it. But then Billy boy was only doing what comes naturally I guess.
Influences others - He definately influenced me at the polling booth, too bad you were too full of koolaid to actually think when you were there.
Courageous - yea, takes a lot of courage when you have terrorist friends that will do the dirty work for you. Poor Joe!
Confident - Confidence he has, too bad it is to take our constitution and tear it apart knowing he will be given a pass to do just that.
Energetic - energy to do what he says? We will have to see that one. So far the media is preparing you for the great let down. Already managing your expectations, and preparing you for the ultimate shock - he will do nothing for you in the near future - better keep up your mortgage payment....
Posted by: Cathy at 11/12/2008 3:51 PM


Eh, don't take these comments to heart - mention politics and it's like petting a cat backwards.

The difference between this and a "real" hiring scenario is that when I interview, I want to know what YOU can contribute - NOT why all my other applicants are lousy. The interview SHOULD be about your strengths and not their shortfalls.

Also, if I didn't like either candidate, I could start over and recruit someone else!
Posted by: HR Pandora at 11/12/2008 3:54 PM


Let's see how insightful you think Obama is when we are all suffering the effects of the Free Choice Act. And yes, you know it is coming. He owes unions BIG TIME after this election.
Posted by: krconley at 11/12/2008 3:58 PM


Obama? Have you kept abreast of anything in regards to issues that will affect HR? Employee Free Choice Act - read up on that act.

And I quote what our soon to be new President said: “We will pass the Employee Free Choice Act. It’s not a matter of 'if'; it’s a matter of 'when.'

How would you like elections without a secret ballot? Union leaders would know how each worker voted - no pressure and intimidation there...yeah, sure.

Enough said.
Posted by: Tina at 11/12/2008 4:01 PM


I would like to welcome Obama Barack for our PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. I feel better issues will be resolved and he will consider the people this time.
Posted by: Virginia Robles( Visit ) at 11/12/2008 4:13 PM


Background:
1.Elected to represent the State of IL as a U.S. Senator
2.A highly-regarded Constitutional scholar. Had our CEO-elect not chosen to run for President, he had strong credentials for nomination to the Supreme Court.
3. Elected President of the Harvard Law Review by his peers.
4. Community activist. A person who has actively wrestled with, and tried to combat, issues of housing, poverty, and education.
5. Ran a campaign largely free of team dissension, managed the campaign budget without going into the red, used creative methods in order to "stretch the map" for his political party beyond traditional bounderies/expectations.
6. Exhibited courage and self-confidence. Seriously placing one's self in the running for CEO takes major 'tude.
7.Displayed a controlled, CEO-like, professional attitude even when faced with personal criticism and, sometimes, attacks.
Posted by: Patricia Thomas at 11/12/2008 4:21 PM


I would think this is an example of how not to hire a CEO. I think your 10 Leadership qualities are very good. However, the only way we have of analyzing items 1, 3, 4 and 6 are from past experience. He has no track record of insightful judgement and other than running for president, has not gotten anything done. The people who are his mentors are not trustworthy and makes you question whether is a good judge of people.

Is he a visionary, and does he inspire others and influence others. He certainly delievers a great speech. He is very charismatic so certainly inspires and influences others. He has a vision. The little I know about it, it is not one I share. However, that said - change is not a vision. It is a platitude.

He is very confident, is energetic and anyone who runs for President is courageous. His resume is thin. His accomplishments are nil. His views are extreme. In my opinion in 90% of companies his resume would not have made the cut to even be considered much less been hired.

In his own way, McCain was no better. He showed no energy. His vision was tired. He certainly did not inspire or influence others. Even his supporters weren't enthusiastic.

In the real world we would have placed another ad, and started the process over again. This was not a good example for an HR process. You know you would never have hired either of these individuals. The political process is definitely not the way anyone would hire an employee, much less the CEO.
Posted by: Greg at 11/12/2008 4:35 PM


You said "Obama aides are currently going around trying to lower what they fear are unrealistically high expectations of what the President-elect will be able to accomplish in his first year or so in office." Why? Every expectation is exactly he said and what got this man elected Commander and Chief. This is what Ms. Thomas' comment alluded to in her point 6. Sarah Palin had more investigation of her background than Sen. Obama. I am already highly disappointed we are getting recycled Clintonites such as the highly partisan Rahm Emmanuel and John Podesta. Both continue to blame EVERYTHING on the last 8 years under Bush. Many believe that if the finacial collapse had not taken place when it did, McCain would be our President today. Obama's election IS a mandate on his ability to get the economy turned around. Step one - stop the bailouts. Or hire Steve Jobs to consult for the auto industry. Our politicians are clueless when it comes to solving problems. Let's pay some experts to get it done right. If we depend on the Barney Franks and Nancy Pelosis making key decisions, we're looking at HR not being needed - except to put severance packages together and ultimately follow the others out the door.
Posted by: RKP at 11/12/2008 4:41 PM


Eileen - bless your heart - you'll know never to mention politics to HR folks!!!! I for one think you do a great job and respect your opinion
Posted by: Dee at 11/12/2008 4:52 PM


Dee - I agree 100% with your
"guidance" for. Politics should be left off this site - period. This election was historic and so critical to our nation in many ways. Yet, it was also contentious as any in our lives as well. I don't believe its HR people - its politics. Try eligion and we'll get the same results. I truly want to thank Eileen for her efforts. Hopefully we all learned something from the reactions. God bless everyone!
Posted by: RKP at 11/12/2008 5:17 PM


I'm dumbfounded to have wasted my "HR" time reading this article that was not worthing publishing. Is Eileen an intern? Here are the real results about Obama that should be FIRED from Americans who salute the FLAG:
1. Poor Judgement
2. Impractical
3. Trustworthy
4. Lazy
5. Lies to the People
6. Can be brought for 90 Million
7. Manipulates People
8. Cowardly
9. Complicated
10.Lethargic
Posted by: Ann Hollingsworth at 11/12/2008 5:22 PM


I thought your article was both neutral and patriotic. I have never seen a bigger bunch of sore losers! Anyone who called themselves a patriot a month ago needs to stand up now and lend their support to our new president whether they voted for him or not!
Posted by: DD at 11/12/2008 6:16 PM


Come on folks, somebody had an opinion, and obviously everyone else has opinions too. I agree that the posting may have been better served on a political blog. I could easy wax on at length about my own views, but for what purpose? The election is a done deal. Today we'll do our jobs. If and when legislated changes are made, we'll again do our jobs. Did everyone do the job that was previously at hand and cast a ballot? If so, then realize we're in a democracy, the vote is in, and the job still at hand.
Posted by: Curt at 11/13/2008 7:08 AM


I thought the article was very positive. President-elect Obama's background is no worse than any of the other past presidents. I agree, the media has a tendency to blow things out of proportion and sway the public. It's unfortunate that some of the comments posted sound like real sore losers!
Posted by: SD at 11/13/2008 8:05 AM


I respect that everyone has an opinion -- that's what a blog is all about. But I also expect everyone to play nicely in the sandbox. Thanks for your cooperation.
Posted by: Gloria at AHI at 11/13/2008 8:18 AM


WOW! You know I didn't vote for Obama, but guess what? He is here and now we have to support him. Yup. That is the way it works. And in 4 years everyone can vote all over again.

I really like the list. This is a good guideline for more than just CEO's.
Posted by: Tracy at 11/13/2008 9:23 AM


This should have been posted on MoveOn.org's website, not an HR site, and certainly not one named after Alexander Hamilton! I don't come here for politics or religion, but for HR.
Posted by: MeDarlin'Boyo at 11/13/2008 11:01 AM


Eileen, I personally thought the article was very positive as well. Your 10 Leadership qualities are extremely valuable in the hiring of a CEO. Good job. President-elect Obama's is our President and I feel we all should support and respect his position.
Posted by: Troy at 11/13/2008 1:24 PM


I believe you can take away two things about this blog... First would be the characteristics of a successful leader that were listed. This is a great article for reference when selecting your management team. The second would be to acknowledge and respect the opinions of all HR professionals (and the employees in your organizations). There is obviously a real fear out there about where our workplaces are going and, legitimate or not, calling them "sore losers" makes the problem worse. Take the politics and personal feelings out of it!
Posted by: Ohio Buckeyes at 11/13/2008 3:32 PM


Susan -- get a life!

"Do you remember that you are talking about Obama? Get real!
Posted by: Susan at 11/11/2008 3:21 PM"
Posted by: American Flag Man at 11/17/2008 10:44 AM


I emailed the following comment to AHI on the 11th. I have yet to hear a response from an editor or anyone on staff...

To Whom It May Concern,

I have been receiving your e-newsletters for quite sometime. I enjoy reading your articles, comments and updates. However, I must say that I do not appreciate Eileen Mager’s HR Soapbox article that appeared in today’s email regarding Senator Obama.

To suggest that survey results consisting of the top CEO qualities are the same as those sought for our nation’s leader may “feel good” but it certainly is not realistic. The voting booth is the one place where we can still exercise our right to choose our leaders based on personal beliefs without censorship of the federal government. We can and do vote for a candidate on the basis of their faith, patriotism and honesty. To many, Christianity and the value of human life is of enormous importance. I also notice experience was not listed among your survey results - but I guess that, too, is passé in Mager’s book.

I found her last paragraph particularly offensive as the only sense that has been inspired in me by the president elect is fear – not hope. Today’s economy is a direct result of Bill Clinton who bungled up the housing industry because he wanted to further the “American dream”. Tell me, what does Eileen Mager believe the American dream is? I’m guessing it isn’t the tried and true, “If you work hard enough, anything is possible…” It is really sad that someone who is gainfully employed and able to use their workplace as a band stand to spew their simplistic political beliefs could actually suggest that the American dream is dead and buried. Please. In fact, with the president elect, that may very well be all we have left – a dream.

As I stated earlier, I do find value from your e-newsletters. However I do not find any value whatsoever in reading the idle political opinions of your writers.
Posted by: shea at 11/18/2008 5:10 PM


Shea,

Thank you for your input. I'd like to respond to the following points:

1. We never received the e-mail you sent on the 11th. To whom did you address the e-mail? If there was a problem with our e-mail delivery system, we'd like to fix it immediately.

2. The survey results were not of the top CEO qualities but, in fact, of the top CEO qualities that survey respondents were looking for in a President. Eileen did not make the leap; she just reported on the existing survey results she'd found from http://www.nextnationalceo.com/, a Personnel Decisions International website. We agree that the President/CEO analogy is not a perfect fit, as is the case with most analogies, but we found the idea interesting enough to share with our readers.

3. Eileen was assigned to write this piece weeks in advance of the election, regardless of who won. The focus was meant to be on hiring and leadership qualities. I regret that some readers misconstrued Eileen's intent as celebrating the election of one candidate over another.

Please feel free to e-mail me directly at gju@ahipubs.com.
Posted by: Gloria at AHI at 11/19/2008 10:58 AM


This article is totally irresponsible; you have broken an HR cardinal rule; politics is not in the workplace due to it becoming to personal. You my friend would have been reprimanded heavily. Although many HR managers and even directors break their own rules/regulations and policies, why? Because most HR managers have lost touch with the real world.
Posted by: Katie at 12/2/2008 2:42 PM


Leave a comment
Name *
Email: *
Homepage
Comment


Sign Up To Receive The HR Soapbox Blog

Copyright © 2010 Alexander Hamilton Institute | Home | Privacy Policy | About AHI | Contact Us | Site Map