HR Compliance Information Specialists - LegalWorkplace.com
Sign In | Register | View Cart
 

Brought to you by the Alexander Hamilton InstituteBrought to you by the Alexander Hamilton Institute

 
  Speak with a customer care representative
by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Speak with a customer care representative by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
FREE E-NEWSLETTERS
Bonus: Sign up today and get a free report, How To Conduct HR Audits.

Employment Law Today
Benefits Alert
HR Soapbox Blog
E-Mail:  Go

We value your privacy.
Research Topics
Benefits
Discipline/Performance Issues
Discrimination
Hiring
Leave
Payroll Management
Privacy Policy Guidelines
Record-Keeping Documents
Safety & Health
Termination
Training
Free Reports
Free HR Forms
Free Job Descriptions & Interview Questions
State DOL & Other HR Websites
Message Board
AHI Store
Products by Topic
Products A to Z
Web Conferences
Labor Law Posters

 

Subscribe: RDF Feed


Recent Posts:

 



Forward blog to a friend.

HR Soapbox Blog

A New Customer Service Low: Hispanic Workers Told To Change Their Names

 Permanent link

(Published November 9, 2009)

Did you hear the one about the hotel owner in Taos, NM, who made some of his Hispanic employees anglicize their first names?  The punch line, and I quote: "It has nothing to do with racism.  I'm not doing it for any reason other than for the satisfaction of my guests, because people calling from all over America don't know the Spanish accents or the Spanish culture or Spanish anything."  This is not a joke, and it's not funny.  His customer satisfaction justification is an insult to both his employees and to his customers. 

Whether he is conscious of it or not, this name-change request smacks of xenophobia.  The message I'm hearing is that we shouldn't have to accept that which is foreign to us until they become more like us.  I certainly don't understand his customer service rationale.  He didn't indicate that he received any complaints, so to me that says he's catering to an assumed desire of customers to not have to deal with ethnic names.  And even if someone had actually complained to him that, say, their check-in experience was poor because the employee's name was Juanita, someone needs to tell him that catering to customers who are dissatisfied because of the ethnicity, race, gender, religion, etc., of the person servicing them is a discrimination claim waiting to happen.
 
And what does this say about what he thinks about his customers?  I think he also insulted the rest of America, by implying that we are ignorant and unsophisticated because, in his words, we "don't know…Spanish anything."  Really???  Okay, so I don't have the ability to roll my Rs.  He's got me there.  In that case, it would be totally unprofessional to employ any Hispanic person with a name with an R in it.  (I'm kidding, of course!) 

I also have to say that if he thinks Anglican names don't ever cause issues, he's wrong.  Who hasn't mistaken Kerry for Carrie or Ron for Rob?  Is Ms. Johns going to be upset if I accidentally call her Ms. Jones?  Is Martin (Mar-TEEN) going to get mad if I accidentally mispronounce his name as Mar-tin?  I surely hope no good customer service rep would!

I really don't understand why he thinks exposure to another culture's names can have such a major effect on customer satisfaction.  If the employees are helpful and pleasant, what do their names matter?  Their names are probably not as foreign to — or uncomfortable for — his customers as he seems to think.  However, if this hotelier is so sure that his customers can benefit from renamed employees, perhaps he should follow Dr. Seuss's lead in The Cat In The Hat and refer to employees as Thing 1, Thing 2, and so on.  Everyone knows their numbers, right?

Gloria Ju
(Or, if I worked in that hotel, you could call me Lori Jones.  Or Thing 3.)
Editor in Chief


Although I don't agree with the reason this individual used for requiring his Hispanic employees to change their names, I have to say it's not the first time I have seen this happen. In fact, in one of my earlier jobs (a national employment agency) it was not uncommon for management to assign 'desk names' to individuals who they believed had names which weren't easily remembered. This practice was so well known back then that I used to have customers ask if the name I was going by was my real name or 'desk name' because my first name and my maiden last name actually rhymed.
Posted by: Laura at 11/9/2009 1:11 PM


I certainly do not agree with the approach listed. However, many years ago I worked with a woman with the last name Woehrle. She got so tired of spelling and respelling her name to clients, that she just started saying/spelling W-O-R-L-E-Y. This, course, was the individual's decision, and not mandated by management.
Posted by: Jane at 11/10/2009 1:02 PM


Dear Editor, I would recommend viewing the video cut from CNN after this news broke where Rick Sanchez interacts with other CNN "talent" on this issue. He had input to share after they had interviewed the hotel owner. It is a "must watch" item.
Posted by: Dane at 11/10/2009 1:20 PM


This doesn't seem very different from the widely-accepted practice of having representatives working out of call centers in India changing their names to "Joe" or "Sally" while interacting with customers. This is done to help connect with customers. Double standard?
Posted by: Nathan at 11/10/2009 1:27 PM


I have a name that is very hard to pronounce, because it is not spelled the way Americans might expect. I have also worked in fields were giving out my real name was a security concern. Thus, I understand using "desk names." What I don't understand is how a case such as the one above come to light without a discrimination claim because it is so clearly rooted in a discriminatory motive. I also think it is a waste of time because if I have a Spanish name -- and nearly one-half billion people in the world do -- why would I patronize a business that sanitized the names of its employees so they didn't sound like me? Further, when it comes to customer service, there is a significant volume of research to support that callers can accurately identify several characteristics over the phone, including race and ethnicity. Since no one is fooled anyway, what is the point of a policy designed to mask cultural identities? If the hotelier has not alienated all of his employees, he has certainly risked alienating a sizable portion of his potential market.
Posted by: Eva at 11/10/2009 2:21 PM


It is one thing if an individual makes a choice to use an anglicized version of their name, but it is quite another to demand that they do so because the boss somehow thinks that having a Spanish name somehow affects customer service. Personally, as long as I am treated well by the person providing the service, I could care less if his name is Joe or Jose.

I have known people who have started using an American version of their name because others had too much trouble pronouncing their real name, but I also worked with one woman from Thailand who was basically forced to use an Americanized version of her name for the first few months she worked for the company, because the supervisor couldn't pronounce her real name and didn't want to bother to try, so told her "We'll just call you by this name instead, it'll be easier." After a few months, the girl finally stood up for herself, told the rest of us how to correctly pronounce her name and also told us her nickname, which was a really easy, two-letter abbreviation of her real name. We all started calling her that and finally the supervisor admitted that it really wasn't that difficult and started calling her by her correct name, also.
Posted by: Cynthia at 11/10/2009 3:50 PM


The irony is that it is coming out of Taos, NM, which is just outside Santa Fe.

That place is probably one of the most liberal, peace, love, happiness and to each his own places in the US.

I think the world must be a little off kilter when something like this happens in Taos!
Posted by: timk at 11/11/2009 11:59 AM


I wonder if this manager would change the name of anyone who had a difficult to pronouce name or just the hispanic employees. If he would also change the name of others, then I may not agree with it but that is a business decision. I may not agree with the dress code either, but he is free to implement what he wants.
Posted by: Elle at 11/11/2009 12:01 PM


While I don't agree with having them "change" their last names, I do believe that a simple solution is pretty evident. Why not just have the employees go by their first names. I can't imagine their first names being all that complicated for anyone....and if they are....so what? Just because you can't pronounce something doesn't mean it should be changed to make it easier for you. Learn how to pronounce it. That's the versatility of America. On the same note though, english should be spoken and I think the hotel owner has every right to demand this. If you're working in this country you should know the country's language and be able to communicate in that language. If I went to France I would expect to have to learn the language; not have everyone coddle me because I don't have the incentive to learn it. If someone is here from another country....great! As long as they go about it legally. That's a huge part of America. Read the Statue of Liberty. But America is also about taking care of yourself and working for what you receive. Not coming here and expecting everyone else to make adjustments for you because you're lacking the incentive to join in on the American way (as in - learn the language).
Posted by: Denise at 11/11/2009 12:07 PM


I don't really care about a persons name, but I do care about anyone coming to our country and expecting us to give up the heritage of our country. If they want to be here they must become fluent in our language and conform to our ways. If that is something they are not willing to do, then come and visit, but go back to your country and enjoy your heritage. I am a proud American and I love my country and my heritage too! If I were to move to another country I would be expected to learn the language and fit in - that is just common sense and certainly would not feel they should change anything for me. I made a choice to leave my country behind - I was not forced into that situation.
Posted by: Vickie at 11/11/2009 12:42 PM


My name is Janie. It's a simple name. I am American; was born here; it's mind. By those who do not hear me clearly, my name is sometimes Janine, Jeannie, etc. I will correct you until you have it right. Whatever excuses we may apply for what happened in the New Mexico hotel, the manager is wrong!
Posted by: Janie at 11/11/2009 1:55 PM


I strongly disagree with the manager, who is simply being racist. It wouldn't surprise me if one of the staff members brought forth an EEO action. This reminds me of the formerly acceptable assumption that airline customers wouldn't like to have anyone other than caucasian stewardesses (they were all women back then) attend to them. No African-Americans were hired. That was successfully challenged, of course, and overturned. Racism is inexcusable in all of its forms.
Posted by: Linda at 11/11/2009 3:11 PM


This isn't racism at all, unless it's racism directed at Caucasians. People who are indigenous to the Iberian peninsula are Caucasians, regardless of whether referred to as "Latino" or "Hispanic." What it could be is discrimination based on national origin. People toss the word "racism" around like a leaf in autumn these days.
Posted by: Paddy at 11/12/2009 11:58 AM


Leave a comment
Name *
Email: *
Homepage
Comment


Sign Up To Receive The HR Soapbox Blog

Copyright © 2010 Alexander Hamilton Institute | Home | Privacy Policy | About AHI | Contact Us | Site Map