HR Compliance Information Specialists - LegalWorkplace.com
Sign In | Register | View Cart
 

Brought to you by the Alexander Hamilton InstituteBrought to you by the Alexander Hamilton Institute

 
  Speak with a customer care representative
by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Speak with a customer care representative by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441


FREE E-NEWSLETTERS
Bonus: Sign up today and get a free report, How To Conduct HR Audits.

We value your privacy.
Research Topics
Benefits
Discipline/Performance Issues
Discrimination
Hiring
Leave
Payroll Management
Privacy Policy Guidelines
Record-Keeping Documents
Safety & Health
Termination
Training
Free Reports
Free HR Forms
Free Job Descriptions & Interview Questions
State DOL & Other HR Websites
Message Board
EL Today Masthead
September 28, 2010

IN THIS ISSUE:

 

1. Feature Story: Give Individuals With Disabilities A Fair Chance


2. Stray Remarks Or Evidence Of Age Discrimination?


3. Free Report: Health Care Reform: Getting Ready For 2011

4. HR Soapbox: Ending An Age-Old Practice Of Permitting Profanities

AHI's We Couldn't Make This Up

Two teenagers were arrested on preliminary theft charges after one allegedly stole money from the tip jar of an ice cream shop.  A clerk at the shop said the teens had just filled out applications for jobs.  No word on whether police used the information on the applications to make the arrests.

THE COMPLETE COMPLIANCE GUIDE TO FEDERAL & STATE EMPLOYMENT LAW

 

It is virtually impossible for anyone to keep track of all of the federal and state employment laws that govern how you manage your workforce. Just one misinterpretation of a law or regulation and you could wind up being investigated by the DOL, EEOC, IRS, or a state labor law enforcement agency. Or, even worse, in court facing a multi-million-dollar lawsuit.

 

The Complete Compliance Guide To Federal & State Employment Law makes it easier for you to tackle today's numerous and complicated employment law challenges without having to incur unnecessary legal fees using a lawyer. With this comprehensive resource, you'll be prepared to answer tough legal questions on difficult Human Resources issues under both federal and state law.

 

Visit our website to get your copy today.

1. FEATURE STORY: GIVE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES A FAIR CHANCE

 

October is National Disability Employment Awareness Month, as designated by Congress.  It is the perfect time to recognize that individuals with disabilities face greater unemployment and underemployed than individuals without disabilities — and to do something about it.  According to figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for the month of August, the unemployment rate for those with disabilities was 15.6%, compared with 9.3% for individuals no disabilities.  Also in August, the BLS released 2009 employment-population ratios, i.e., the proportion of the population employed.  The ratio for persons with a disability was 19.2%, compared with 64.5% for those without a disability.

 

Even the federal government — the nation's largest employer — is working to improve its employment of disabled individuals.  Individuals with disabilities currently represent just over 5% of the nearly two million people in the federal workforce.  In July, President Obama signed an Executive Order, titled Increasing Federal Employment of Individuals with Disabilities, which calls for:

  • the design of model recruitment and hiring strategies for agencies seeking to increase their employment of people with disabilities,

  • the development of mandatory training programs for HR and hiring managers on the employment of individuals with disabilities,

  • the development of specific plans for promoting employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities,

  • the implementation of strategies for retaining workers with disabilities, and

  • improving, expanding, and increasing successful return-to-work outcomes for those injured on the job.

In the 2010 Kessler/National Organization on Disability Survey of Americans with Disabilities, 43% of individuals with disabilities reported encountering employment discrimination, including being paid less than similarly situated workers (18%), being refused a job (17%), being given less responsibility than co-workers (12%), being denied a hiring interview (11%), and being denied a promotion (10%).

 

Start Reaching Out

Tap into the underutilized skills of individuals with disabilities by posting job openings at local vocational rehabilitation offices and disability advocacy organizations. Make them feel welcome during the hiring process by:

  • Taking a disclosed disability into consideration when providing directions to the workplace for the interview.  For example, if the individual uses a wheelchair, consider distance, weather conditions, and physical obstacles, such as curbs, stairs, and steep hills.
  • Ensuring that the interview location, whether it's your office or another office space, is easily accessible for all.  In other words, make sure that your office isn't so cluttered that it's hard for you to maneuver, let alone an individual who uses a cane, has a visual impairment, etc.
  • Granting accommodations for the application and interview process wherever reasonable and necessary.

Stop Stereotyping

When considering an individual with a disability for a particular position, focus on their knowledge, abilities, credentials, and experience, and not on their disability.  The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the courts don't look kindly on employers that assume that an individual with a disability is incapable of doing a job, especially when there is evidence to the contrary.

 

Example: An applicant's online application qualified her for an interview.  Upon meeting the applicant, a hiring manager learned that she was blind and immediately stated: "This isn't going to work out."  Despite the applicant's attempts to explain that she had successfully performed similar work for over eight years with the aid of assistive technology, the manager repeated the sentiment and turned away the applicant without interviewing her.  The manager's actions resulted in a $55,000 settlement with the EEOC.  (EEOC v. Sentry Credit, Inc., D.C. WA, No. CV-09-0147 MJP, 2010) 

 

It's imperative that employers give individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to prove themselves.  All employees should be given the chance to do a job to the best of their abilities and to be assessed on their own terms.  Adverse employment decisions should be based on observed performance problems, not on potential or unknown future issues.

 

Example: An employee was hired for a payroll position.  Before her first day on the job was over, she had been fired.  The EEOC alleged that she was let go after her supervisor discovered that her left arm was paralyzed.  The company paid the employee, who "was not even given a full day to prove herself," $30,000 to settle the EEOC's lawsuit.  (EEOC v. Akeena Solar, Inc., N.D.CA, No. C08-4527 PVT, 2010) 

 

If you're going to use an employee's disability as a justification for their termination, you must be able to show that the disability prevented the employee from performing the job or created a safety risk.  If you believe an employee is unable to perform the job or poses a safety risk, you must engage in the interactive process and explore whether a reasonable accommodation exists that can help the employee perform essential job functions or eliminate the safety risk.

 

Example: An employee who was an amputee successfully worked as a secretary in a funeral home for almost two years.  Once she required the use of a wheelchair, she was fired.  The company claimed that, if the employee could not walk, she would not be able to carry out her secretarial duties.  EEOC: The company should have given the employee the chance to "demonstrate her abilities to carry out her work functions using a chair," rather than firing her based on "its own stereotypes of what a person who uses a wheelchair can and cannot do."  Payout to employee: $62,500.  (EEOC v. S.C.C., Inc., d/b/a Attrell's Newberg Funeral Chapel, D.C. OR, No. cv-09-1009-HU, 2010)

2. STRAY REMARKS OR EVIDENCE OF AGE DISCRIMINATION?
 

While it is never okay for employers to make disparaging comments about an employee's age (or any other personal characteristic, for that matter), not all age-related remarks are fodder for an age discrimination lawsuit....Continue the story.

3. FREE REPORT: HEALTH CARE REFORM: GETTING READY FOR 2011

 

Read the Free Report, "Health Care Reform: Getting Ready For 2011" outlines the health care reform requirements that take effect with plan years that begin on or after September 23, 2010 (January 1, 2011, for calendar year plans), and advises employers on the specific actions to take now.  Learn about the new dependent coverage rules for adult children and the new rule relating to the purchase of over-the-counter medications.  Also covered are interim final regulations related to grandfathered plans, consumer protections, preventive services, and claim appeals procedures.

4. HR SOAPBOX: ENDING AN AGE-OLD PRACTICE OF PERMITTING PROFANITIES

 

In deciding whether to discipline or terminate an employee for using profanity, a common consideration is whether such language is part and parcel of the work environment.  If it's normal practice for employees to use vulgar language as friendly banter with co-workers, many employers look the other way.  Goldman Sachs used to — since swearing has long been a tradition on Wall Street — but isn't anymore....Continue the story.

Like What You're Reading?
Sign Up To Receive Our Free E-Mail Newsletters

Employment Law Today

Benefits Alert

HR Soapbox Blog

E-Mail:  Go

Copyright © 2010 by Alexander Hamilton Institute, Inc.
Employment Law Resource Center at www.legalworkplace.com
ahinewsletter@legalworkplace.com
(800) 879-2441 • 70 Hilltop Road • Ramsey, NJ 07446
 

Copyright © 2013 Alexander Hamilton Institute | Home | Privacy Policy | About AHI | Contact Us | Site Map