HR Compliance Information Specialists - LegalWorkplace.com
Sign In | Register | View Cart
 

Brought to you by the Alexander Hamilton InstituteBrought to you by the Alexander Hamilton Institute

 
  Speak with a customer care representative
by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Speak with a customer care representative by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Sign Up To Receive Our Free E-Mail Newsletters
Employment Law Today
Benefits Alert
HR Soapbox Blog
Cathie's Corner Blog
E-Mail:  Go
Research Topics
Benefits
Discipline/Performance Issues
Discrimination
Hiring
Leave
Payroll Management
Privacy Policy Guidelines
Record-Keeping Documents
Safety & Health
Termination
Training
Free Reports
Free HR Forms
Free Job Descriptions & Interview Questions
State DOL & Other HR Websites
Message Board

EL Today Masthead
March 17, 2009

IN THIS ISSUE:

 

1. Feature Story: Organized Labor Gets A Boost From Four New Executive Orders. Is The EFCA Next?


2. Cathie's Corner: Hearing Is Not Necessarily Believing


3. Manager Puts Up Language Barriers; EEOC Knocks Them Down

4. Free Report: Pay Discrimination Audits: Ensuring Your Organization Is Protected Against Ledbetter Complaints 

 

5. HR Soapbox: Why Anti-Bullying Laws Aren't Realistic

AHI's We Couldn't Make This Up 

 

A lawyer in the New York office of an international law firm has taken the idea of looking busy to a whole new level. The lights at the firm were controlled by a motion detector, so whenever the lawyer left his office, the lights automatically dimmed. He wanted others to think he was working late into the night, so what did he do? Actually stay and work? Nah! He brought in an oscillating fan to trick the motion detectors into keeping the lights on.

1. FEATURE STORY:
ORGANIZED LABOR GETS A BOOST FROM FOUR NEW EXECUTIVE ORDERS. IS THE EFCA NEXT?
 

 

Only a few weeks after taking his Oath of Office, President Obama issued four pro-union Executive Orders, reversing some of the pro-employer policies that had been implemented during the previous administration and imposing significant new obligations on federal contractors. On March 10, Democrats re-introduced the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) in both houses of Congress. President Obama has long supported the EFCA.

Under the EFCA, employers would be forced to recognize a union that has received signed union authorization cards from more than 50% of employees and would no longer be able to request a secret ballot election. Two weeks prior, Republicans introduced the Secret Ballot Protection Act into both houses.

The EFCA also requires binding arbitration if the employer and union cannot reach a collective bargaining agreement within 120 days. Employer penalties for unfair labor practices are also increased under the EFCA.

While the EFCA does not yet have President Obama's signature on it, here's a short summary of the new Executive Orders that do.
 

Notification Of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws  

Notification Of Employee Rights Under Federal Labor Laws revokes Executive Order 13201, the "Beck Notice Requirements," which required employers to post a notice advising employees that they are not required to join a union or maintain a union membership in order to retain their jobs.

The new Executive Order imposes an obligation to inform employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). All qualifying federal contractors will be required to post a new notice advising employees of their rights to bargain collectively and to be protected in the exercise of their right to association, self-organization, and designation of representatives for purposes of negotiating terms and conditions of employment.

This Order also contains four new contract clauses that must be included in all qualifying government contracts and resulting subcontracts, effective immediately.

Tip: The Secretary of Labor has 120 days in which to prescribe the size, form, and content of the notice to be posted.

 

Nondisplacement Of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts  

Nondisplacement Of Qualified Workers Under Service Contracts revokes Executive Order 13204, which was issued in 2001 to remove the requirement that successive contractors offer a right of first refusal of employment to employees of the prior contractor.

The new Executive Order requires employers assuming government service contracts to offer their predecessor employers' employees the right of first refusal in positions for which they are qualified. The right of first refusal must last for at least 10 days.

Key implications: If the new employer draws a majority of its workforce from predecessor employees that are union members, the new employer may be forced to bargain with that union, even though the union has not been certified as its own employees' representative.Tip: Labor costs may balloon unexpectedly if you find yourself having to hire your predecessor's unionized employees and, subsequently, having to bargain with that union, so keep the new successorship obligations in mind when deciding whether to bid on a government contract.

 

Economy In Government Contracting  

Economy In Government Contracting prohibits federal contractors from seeking reimbursement for the costs of any activities undertaken to persuade employees to join or — as is far more likely — not to join a union. So the cost of preparing anti-union materials, hiring legal counsel or consultants, holding meetings (including the cost of salaries for attendees), planning or conducting such persuasive activity, etc., are no longer reimbursable.

Tip: Federal contractors are not prohibited from engaging in such activities, but must take care to segregate reimbursable activities from disallowed expenditures when seeking reimbursement.

 

Use Of Project Labor Agreements For Federal Construction Projects  

Use Of Project Labor Agreements For Federal Construction Projects revokes Executive Orders 13202 and 13208. It authorizes executive agencies of the federal government to require every contractor or subcontractor on a large-scale construction project (where the total cost to the federal government is at least $25 million) to negotiate or become a party to a Project Labor Agreement (PLA). A PLA is a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement with one or more unions that establishes the terms and conditions of employment for a specific construction project.

Tip: Concerned that once your non-union employees are represented by a union on a PLA, the employees might seek representation on other work? Make sure the PLA does not include language that will automatically extend the terms of the agreement to the rest of your operations.

2. CATHIE'S CORNER:
 HEARING IS NOT NECESSARILY BELIEVING

We've all had this happen. An employee comes in to ask a question. You answer the question. But the employee doesn't accept the answer because he or she "has heard" a different answer somewhere else....Continue the story.

3. MANAGER PUTS UP LANGUAGE BARRIERS; EEOC KNOCKS THEM DOWN

Managers need to adjust to the ever-increasing diversity of today's workforce. This includes adjusting the mindset that employees must speak perfect English and must speak English at all times....Continue the story.

4. FREE REPORT: PAY DISCRIMINATION AUDITS: ENSURING YOUR ORGANIZATION IS PROTECTED AGAINST LEDBETTER COMPLAINTS
 

Check out the new Free Report, "Pay Discrimination Audits: Ensuring Your Organization Is Protected Against Ledbetter Complaints," which guides you in conducting a voluntary pay audit. Learn when it's okay to pay different wages to similarly situated employees, and how to adapt OFCCP non-discrimination pay guidelines to the private sector.

5. HR SOAPBOX: "WE LIKE YOU! WE REALLY LIKE YOU! YOU'RE HIRED!"

"The Dark Knight" really is kind of dark, isn't he? Christian Bale, the most recent actor to fill Batman's cod piece on the silver screen, has become known for his hot temper. Last year, he was arrested on a domestic violence charge involving his mother and sister, which was later dropped due to lack of evidence. Earlier this year, he was caught on tape screaming vulgarities and threatening the job of the director of photography (DP) who walked into his field of vision while shooting a scene. Is Bale the only person to ever go off on a co-worker? Of course not. He just happens to be famous…and it was caught on tape. That would be great evidence if the DP wanted to take Bale, or the production company, to court. But what could he take them to court for? Proponents of anti-bullying laws would argue that this is a classic case of bullying in the workplace, but there are no anti-bullying laws on the books....Continue the story.

Like What You're Reading?
Sign Up To Receive Our Free E-Mail Newsletters

Employment Law Today

Benefits Alert

HR Soapbox Blog

E-Mail:  Go

Copyright © 2009 by Alexander Hamilton Institute, Inc.
Employment Law Resource Center at www.legalworkplace.com
ahinewsletter@legalworkplace.com
(800) 879-2441 • 70 Hilltop Road • Ramsey, NJ 07446
 

Copyright © 2009 Alexander Hamilton Institute | Home | Privacy Policy | About AHI | Contact Us | Site Map