HR Compliance Information Specialists - LegalWorkplace.com
Sign In | Register | View Cart
 

Brought to you by the Alexander Hamilton InstituteBrought to you by the Alexander Hamilton Institute

 
  Speak with a customer care representative
by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Speak with a customer care representative by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441


FREE E-NEWSLETTERS
Bonus: Sign up today and get a free report, How To Conduct HR Audits.

We value your privacy.
Research Topics
Benefits
Discipline/Performance Issues
Discrimination
Hiring
Leave
Payroll Management
Privacy Policy Guidelines
Record-Keeping Documents
Safety & Health
Termination
Training
Free Reports
Free HR Forms
Free Job Descriptions & Interview Questions
State DOL & Other HR Websites
Message Board
AHI Store
Products by Topic
Products A to Z
Labor Law Posters

 

Subscribe: RDF Feed


Recent Posts:

 



Forward blog to a friend.

HR Soapbox Blog

Should Employees Be Fired For Their Facebook Faux Pas?

 Permanent link

(Published May 31, 2010)

Bookmark and Share

People are still learning that what they post on "private" Facebook pages is not as private as they may think.  And some are learning it the hard way, after being fired from their jobs because of their posts.  The question this raises is less about whether employers can do this and more about whether they should.  

A couple of weeks ago, a waitress was fired after venting on Facebook about a couple of her customers.  It seems that the couple dined for three hours, forcing the waitress to work an hour past the end of her shift, and then left her a $5 tip.  The waitress went home and wrote: "Thanks for eating at Brixx, you cheap piece of **** camper."

Management found out about it and fired her for violating policies on disparaging customers and casting the company in a negative light online.  The restaurant posted a statement on its own Facebook page regarding the incident, which generated plenty of responses, most of which sided with the waitress and called for a boycott of the restaurant.

Many of the restaurant's critics mentioned the Constitution, free speech, and privacy rights.  The reality is, freedom of speech does not apply in private workplaces; the First Amendment applies to the government.  There is no "privacy law" that some seem to think exists to protect everything that anyone says from adverse consequences.  Sure, the waitress has the right to say what she did. But the restaurant also has the right not to tolerate it.

Employers generally have employment at-will on their side; plus, Brixx had policies in place that the waitress violated.  Even in those states that have laws prohibiting discrimination based on lawful off-duty conduct, conduct that can hurt the company's reputation does not automatically get a free pass.  So that covers the can part.

But should Brixx have fired the waitress?  In my opinion, I don't think it should have.  Unless its policies on disparaging customers and casting the company in a negative light are zero-tolerance, and assuming this is the waitress's first offense, I think it would have been more appropriate to ask her to remove the post; review applicable company policies and examples of violations; warn her that future offenses would warrant disciplinary action; and provide a much-needed lesson on online etiquette. 

First lesson being, privacy settings may not be as tight as you think.  Second lesson: Not all of your Facebook friends are your friends and are often the ones who disclose private information to the public.  Finally, vent all you want, but keep the company's name (and your connection to the company) out of it.

While the waitress may have needed reminders about the reality of online postings, employers also need to be reminded that, just because you can take action, doesn't mean you always should.  Differentiate between material that can truly have an adverse effect on the company from material that you simply may not like or agree with.  Employers that are heavy-handed when it comes to employees' personal postings — especially ones that were intended to remain private — will hurt morale and retention, and, in some cases, the public image they're trying to protect.

Gloria Ju
Editor in Chief


Hence the reason I post here under a pseudonym. Seriously, though, how does this apply to federal employees? The HATCH Act is pretty scary in light of such sites as Facebook. I mean, I work for the government, but does that automatically mean I'm not allowed to disagree with it online? I certainly hope not. I get confused when it comes to what is a problem and what isn't. I have a blog under a different pseudonym but I'm not stupid enough to believe it's foolproof; what can and can't I say on it as a federal employee?
And please don't just give me the blanket "well you shouldn't do it, you should talk to people in person" response. I'm a teensy bit agoraphobic. Communicating online is my savior, and I enjoy venting to my friends and "followers." It's a definite boost to the self-esteem when a total stranger enjoys your words so much that they want to "follow" you. We need more pronounced boundaries, though.
Posted by: CYA at 6/1/2010 2:15 PM


We had a similar situation where a very public employee vented some frustration about the organization via her blog. We didn't let her go, but spoke to her rather firmly about the inappropriate nature of her comments. We also re-issued our relevant policy to the employees at large. So far, that seems to have worked. But the verdict is still out, as the same employee remains rather outspoken (albeit in more appropriate ways).
Posted by: Linda at 6/1/2010 3:27 PM


CYA, this website might help you: http://www.osc.gov/hatchact.htm.
Posted by: Gloria at AHI at 6/1/2010 3:59 PM


Gloria, thank you! That site is priceless, and you'd better believe I forwarded the link to a few friends who needed it as much as I did.
Posted by: CYA at 6/1/2010 4:52 PM


So wait, let me get this straight....Employers are ALLOWED to snoop on line and review our private conversations and blogs, even if those take place outside of work, and then use our comments to hold it against us? Nice. Freedom of speech taken a kick in the b***s from corporate political correctness.
Posted by: AB at 6/2/2010 2:31 PM


Freedom of speech is only a protection from the Government silencing you, not your private employer. Can they do it..that's up for debate, should they do it, probably not a best practice...but they do have an interest in protecting their name/brand etc.
Posted by: RJ at 6/2/2010 4:14 PM


A final warning maybe, if this was the company policy for commenting negatively on a gratuity. I've worked in HR in hospitality; commenting negatively on a gratuity should not be tolerated. This server did it in a forum that had the ability, and did, to go viral. Employees need to be reminded that nothing is private online.
Posted by: Rebecca Mazin( Visit ) at 6/4/2010 11:50 AM


First the incident described about "the waitress and the firing" does not surprise me in the least, considering the industry involved. Federal and State law is not a settled matter so it does not “cover the can part” in absolute terms, on the contrary in my view. An employer’s power to terminate an employee for expressions of opinion is not absolute-particularly off the job. Notable exceptions exist for “union activity”, anti-retaliation provisions of discrimination laws, and Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance. The law on free speech in this area is still evolving which is why you see statuary reading not addressed, however the courts will hear more of these cases as incidents as Gloria described become common place and public out cry gets louder.

State free speech law goes further than the federal law in many states, to cover legal activity outside the workplace. Courts recently have been citing The Stored Communications Act as well to protect employee's web content from employers without their express consent, even where management had gained access to such websites through other employees who were approved to visit the site.


AB-the real reason employers are alarmed and "snoop" on employees is obvious--Blogging has tremendous potential to shift the balance of power from employers to employees, as employees gain the ability to communicate their concerns to other employees, customers, neighbors, stockholders, and other parties interested in the employer. While many businesses already communicate with the public through well-organized, well-funded marketing and public relations departments, employees now have an inexpensive way to get their own messages out to the public--a factor of rising importance in modern labor disputes that no doubt will work its way through the courts. When they do Employees can be expected to argue that blogs that may be offensive or embarrassing to the employer but are lawful recreational activities under the law. Employers, however, can only press a narrow interpretation of the law that recognizes the employer’s right to manage its business and protect its reputation and confidential information.

Aside from the legal consequences of terminating an employee’s employment for blogging activity, employers need to be prepared for the public relations ramifications from such terminations. There is no doubt that this restaurant will lose far more in revenue than one cheap skate customer who was not raised right in the first place ,whom stiffed the waitress out of a her just deserved tip. These types of customer are the ones you want to lose anyway. Unless the employer is willing to trump up the lost tip (15% minimum on the meal) then the employer in my view is not in any position to tell the server of intolerability in regards to a chunk of her wage not provided by the employer.
Posted by: JoeC at 6/15/2010 11:51 AM


Yep! Also you may want to consider if a case does go to court the employee can name individuals in their suit. So as a manager that likes snooping on their employees you should be careful. You may end up involved in your own lawsuit. Remember a civil suit takes a lot less to win. Your house, wages, well anything that will hold a lien can be taken..... So a word of advice. Treat people as you would like to be treated and remember if you are fair you will prevail.
Posted by: Arron at 6/17/2010 11:43 AM


-1'
Posted by: at 5/15/2011 8:56 AM


I agree to give my employer notice period.
Posted by: Coach Factory Online( Visit ) at 5/29/2012 3:49 AM


1
Posted by: at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


1
Posted by: at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


1
Posted by: at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


1
Posted by: at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


1
Posted by: ( Visit ) at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


1
Posted by: at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


1
Posted by: at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


-1'
Posted by: at 6/22/2012 3:28 AM


Although one time can not tell the name of these guys, but this shoe engineered hand to do extremely worthy of promotion, if the quality has improved better!
Posted by: Nike Trainers( Visit ) at 12/1/2012 12:44 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/11/2013 6:17 AM


1
Posted by: ( Visit ) at 1/11/2013 6:17 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/11/2013 6:17 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/11/2013 6:18 AM


-1'
Posted by: at 1/11/2013 6:18 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/18/2013 11:24 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/18/2013 11:24 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/18/2013 11:24 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/18/2013 11:24 AM


1
Posted by: ( Visit ) at 1/18/2013 11:24 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/18/2013 11:24 AM


1
Posted by: at 1/23/2013 4:01 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/23/2013 4:01 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/23/2013 4:01 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/23/2013 4:02 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/23/2013 4:02 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/23/2013 4:02 PM


-1'
Posted by: at 1/23/2013 4:03 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/24/2013 8:50 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/24/2013 8:50 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/24/2013 8:50 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/24/2013 8:50 PM


1
Posted by: ( Visit ) at 1/24/2013 8:51 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/24/2013 8:51 PM


1
Posted by: at 1/24/2013 8:51 PM


-1'
Posted by: at 1/24/2013 8:51 PM


1
Posted by: at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


1
Posted by: at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


1
Posted by: at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


1
Posted by: at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


1
Posted by: ( Visit ) at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


1
Posted by: at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


1
Posted by: at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


-1'
Posted by: at 2/5/2013 8:31 AM


Leave a comment
Name *
Email: *
Homepage
Comment


Sign Up To Receive The HR Soapbox Blog

Copyright © 2013 Alexander Hamilton Institute | Home | Privacy Policy | About AHI | Contact Us | Site Map