HR Compliance Information Specialists - LegalWorkplace.com
Sign In | Register | View Cart
 

Brought to you by the Alexander Hamilton InstituteBrought to you by the Alexander Hamilton Institute

 
  Speak with a customer care representative
by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
Speak with a customer care representative by dialing toll-free (800) 879-2441
FREE E-NEWSLETTERS
Bonus: Sign up today and get a free report, How To Conduct HR Audits.

Employment Law Today
Benefits Alert
HR Soapbox Blog
E-Mail:  Go

We value your privacy.
Research Topics
Benefits
Discipline/Performance Issues
Discrimination
Hiring
Leave
Payroll Management
Privacy Policy Guidelines
Record-Keeping Documents
Safety & Health
Termination
Training
Free Reports
Free HR Forms
Free Job Descriptions & Interview Questions
State DOL & Other HR Websites
Message Board
AHI Store
Products by Topic
Products A to Z
Web Conferences
Labor Law Posters

 

Subscribe: RDF Feed


Recent Posts:

 


Categories:



Forward blog to a friend.

Cathie's Corner Blog

Even Confused Employees Must Be Taken Seriously

(Discipline and Performance, Discrimination and Harassment) Permanent link

Last week, I gave you something of a tongue-in-cheek treatise on discrimination, retaliation, and harassment. It's quite true that many employees misunderstand what is meant by those terms and will claim discrimination, etc., when that's not what happened at all. But I do want to share with you a couple of real-life situations that show how important it is to document the incidents that are reported to you.

I've talked about the following story before, but in a different context. I was the HR manager for a small company with approximately 90 employees, almost a third of whom were foreign born. One morning, a manager, who had been born in Poland, complained that an employee had downloaded his own screensaver (which was allowed under company policy) that depicted a swastika. I talked to the employee, who explained that the symbol was not a swastika, but a symbol of his religion. A quick search on the Internet showed this to be true. I explained this to the manager, who claimed he was not asking for the screensaver to be taken down; however, it was clear that that was what he really wanted.

Those who are born in Eastern nations do not study Western history any more than we study theirs. It became clear in my conversation with the employee that he honestly had no idea what that symbol means to the Western world. When I explained, he was horrified and he voluntarily took it down, replacing it with another screensaver that also had religious connotations for him, but which omitted the offensive (to us) symbol.

I'll tell you, this is a situation I hope I never have to face again. Had the employee not taken the screensaver down voluntarily, things could have gotten nasty. Had we allowed him to leave it up, I could see the manager claiming harassment. Had we forced the employee to take it down, I could see him claiming religious discrimination. I'm not saying either of them would have had a valid case, but as I've been saying, it doesn't have to be valid for employees to claim it. You can bet I documented exactly what happened in case either of them, at some point, suffered some kind of adverse action and claimed retaliation.

In another instance, an employee made an error that damaged a piece of equipment. It was an inadvertent error, but he was not supposed to be using the equipment in the first place; he was supposed to have someone who knew how to use the equipment run it for him. The equipment was out of use for 24 hours while it was being repaired, which affected each and every employee. The employee was told gently, but firmly, not to use it again without checking. Then, after we'd paid something like $600 for the repair, the employee ran the equipment without contacting someone who knew how to use it and ruined it all over again. Yes, I documented the resulting discipline!

And a good thing, too. Only two weeks later, we had a major layoff, and the employee was let go. I was glad to have had the documentation because this employee was a foreign national and his personality was such that I would not have been surprised if he had claimed national origin discrimination. We selected him for layoff because his position was one that could be done without and because his performance was marginal. He was already on the potential layoff list, but the final decision had not been made before he ruined the equipment. That just put the icing on the cake. I was glad to have the back-up documentation just in case.

Even if the "discrimination" (or whatever) claim is unfounded, even if the employee's definition of the word does not remotely resemble the legal definition, keep your documentation up. You never know when it might come in handy.

Catherine Bannon is an HR consultant in Marshfield, MA (catherine.bannon@gmail.com). Bannon worked for 10 years in HR management before starting her consulting practice.

  


Another frustration is the employee who because they have complained, believe they have the right then to behave inappropriately, ignore established policy and rule, claiming "retaliation" if such issues are addressed. (Addressed as with all/any employee who does not follow protocol whether they have complained or not.... ) Your thoughts?
Posted by: kate at 5/28/2008 6:51 AM


Sounds like a good topic for another article. But you're right; a lot of employees do think that complaining makes them "discipline proof". That's where consistant documentation is necessary. And you need to be certain to keep the discussion focused; "This is not about your complaining about Joe - this is about your ________".
Posted by: Cathie at 5/28/2008 9:26 AM


As a manager myself, I was angry at my domestic partner,
a City government employee,
negotiating an early retirement incentive package - without my input. i saw the
letter contract she was required to sign that day, and it violated the Older Persons Act - I asked her to point that out to the HR director before she signed, but she feared that the offer would be withdrawn if she made waves., and there was talk of layoffs..
It can't happen - and she was
signing a false official city document - it didn't give her the 21/7 days thinktime to discuss it with me!
it was probably a bureaucratic paperwork problem, with all on board except myself, so i emailed a
friendly note that they were
violating the Elder Persons Act, please fix the letter, and advise your employee and my partner that I am correct
to get me out of the doghouse.

The City Manager never answered my eMail - my partner
rushed to his office, asked the assistant to destroy the eMail without reading it- and
they complied - My eMail wasn't answered!!!
This City Manager obviously doesn't subscribe to AHS- and
he's created several more Taboos for your list.
My partner, after 60 days
retired, is fighting with the
City, who cut her cash payoff incentive by 7% and making other small dents in her package she doesn't acknowledge because i'm still in that doghouse.
i can't report the lawbreaking without being further "canineized" and my
significent other will be put off by the Good Manager until one of us moves on to a
Better Office.
So I'm the one that is harrassed, and retaliated against ...for doing the right thing.
My question - what is the right thing?
Posted by: HUGH WILLIAMS at 6/9/2008 2:29 PM


I am recently experiencing a harassment complaint I filed. Where the co-worker was harassing me with lies, writing on my paperwork, and the supervisors were listen to her, without asking me any questions. So I have decided to resign from my poisiton and go back to my old positon because nothing is being done about this. Need advice please...
Posted by: EJ at 11/11/2008 10:53 AM


Leave a comment
Name *
Email: *
Homepage
Comment


Sign Up To Receive Cathie's Corner Blog

Copyright © 2010 Alexander Hamilton Institute | Home | Privacy Policy | About AHI | Contact Us | Site Map